Sometimes the factual background to a tribunal claim sounds like it has come straight out of high school. Billings v Nestle UK is one of those claims. The fire alarm had gone off at the factory where Mr Billings worked, requiring a full evacuation. An investigation into the cause of the fire alarm concluded that somebody had been vaping in the toilets. Nestle alleged that that somebody was Mr Billings. If this had been High School, Mr Billings would no doubt have received a detention, nothing more. However, this being employment (and in a factory environment), he was dismissed for gross misconduct. The tribunal held that Mr Billings had been unfairly dismissed:

  • The disciplinary officer was more concerned about Mr Billings’s lack of apology than the vaping itself. He openly acknowledged that, if Mr Billings had admitted the conduct, he would not have been dismissed. The tribunal concluded that “failing to apologise or to accept responsibility is not misconduct”. The employer should not have relied upon it.
  • Dismissal fell outside the range of reasonable responses available, given that this was a single isolated act in an otherwise unblemished career. 
  • The employer had no policy which specifically said that vaping at work would be regarded as gross misconduct.

There are lessons to be learnt by employers from this high school-worthy situation:

  • If vaping at work is really that much of an issue, you should make that crystal clear in your policies
  • Length of service and a clean disciplinary record can be important factors when considering whether summary dismissal is an appropriate sanction in response to alleged gross misconduct.
  • Disciplinary officers should stick to the allegations in front of them and not get distracted by irrelevant points such as, in this case, the lack of an apology.

About Jon Dunkley

Jon Dunkley is a Partner at Wollens and heads up the firm’s Regulatory Department. Based at our North Devon office, Jon is a highly experienced solicitor with a broad commercial and regulatory practice, supporting businesses, professionals and senior employees across a wide range of legal issues.

Speak to Jon Dunkley

Jon is a Partner at Wollens and can advise you. Contact Jon via email jon.dunkley@wollens.co.uk or call 01271 341021.

Jon Dunkley - Wollens Solicitors Devon

You can also complete an online enquiry form. One of the Wollens team will contact you as soon as they are available.

Related News & Insights

3 minute read
When 25% becomes 2.5%: a useful reminder on Acas Code uplifts - Wollens Solicitors Devon

When 25% becomes 2.5%: a useful reminder on Acas Code uplifts

Read Article
3 minute read
Belief discrimination: where are we now? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Belief discrimination: where are we now?

Read Article
3 minute read
Training cost clawbacks: when does repayment become an unlawful restraint? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Training cost clawbacks: when does repayment become an unlawful restraint?

Read Article
3 minute read
Third-party harassment is coming back: are you ready? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Third-party harassment is coming back: are you ready?

Read Article
3 minute read
Sexual harassment training: When does training become ‘stale’? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Sexual harassment training: When does training become ‘stale’?

Read Article
3 minute read
Equal pay, but not just for sex? Government consults on a major rethink of pay discrimination - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Equal pay, but not just for sex? Government consults on a major rethink of pay discrimination

Read Article
1 minute read
Sticking to the legal minimum is not necessarily good HR practice - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Sticking to the legal minimum is not necessarily good HR practice

Read Article
2 minute read
The right to be accompanied: don’t ask, don’t get? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

The right to be accompanied: don’t ask, don’t get?

Read Article