What is a Section 278 Agreement?

A Section 278 Agreement is a legal agreement between a developer and a highway authority to carry out highway works.

The Phantom Copyright: | Wollens Solicitors Devon

Is a Stormtrooper Helmet Really Art?

If you think everything in Star Wars is protected by copyright, you’re not alone. But in Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth, the UK Supreme Court had to decide whether a Stormtrooper helmet was a work of art – or just a fancy bit of costume.

Andrew Ainsworth, the original prop designer, began selling replica helmets years after the film’s release. Lucasfilm sued, claiming the helmets were “sculptures” and protected under UK copyright law. Ainsworth argued they were functional props, not artistic works – and therefore not covered by copyright.

What did the court decide?

The court ruled that the helmets were not sculptures under UK copyright law. While they were iconic and involved creative skill, their main purpose was practical – to be worn by actors. That meant they didn’t qualify as “artistic works” and weren’t protected by copyright in the UK.

Lucasfilm could still enforce its rights in the US, but in the UK, Ainsworth was free to sell his replicas.

Why it matters

This case draws a sharp line between art and utility. UK copyright law protects “artistic works”, but not everything designed with flair qualifies. The court made it clear: functionality can override creativity when it comes to legal protection.

For designers, prop makers, and creatives, this is a reminder to understand the limits of copyright – and to consider design rights, contracts, and licensing as part of your IP strategy.

Need advice?

If you’re developing products, licensing designs, or facing an IP dispute, our team can help. Get in touch to protect your work and avoid costly surprises.