The Watford Employment Tribunal recently heard an unfair dismissal case, the facts of which provide some clear guidance to employers of what not to do when dismissing an employee. 

In Kleina v Polish Village Bread the claimant was employed by the respondent as transport manager. There was a dispute between the two owners of the business and the claimant was caught-up in it. He went off work sick for five months with a cardiac issue. Several of his fit notes also mentioned work-related health issues. None of this was investigated by the respondent. 

When he returned to work, he was immediately called to a meeting and summarily dismissed for gross misconduct. No investigation was carried out. The respondent alleged that, some five months previously, the claimant had cancelled a contract with a customer without the consent of one of the respondent’s owners. The claimant denied this. He appealed his dismissal and the appeal took a further two months to complete. 

The tribunal held that his dismissal was both substantively and procedurally unfair. No investigation had been carried out. The evidence did not show that the claimant had cancelled the contract without the consent of the owner – in fact the owner’s contact details were included on the email to the customer cancelling the contract. The incident occurred five months before the dismissal and the appeal was two months later – the respondent did not act without delay. There was also no investigation and no attempt to ascertain the facts before acting.

This is obviously a fairly extreme case where the claimant was caught in a corporate dispute between two owners of a business. However, some general lessons can be taken from it:

  • If you become aware of an allegation of misconduct then it should be raised and investigated without delay. The employer in this case was criticised for waiting for four months to raise the issue.
  • Any allegation of misconduct should always be fully investigated before any action is taken. This should include verifying any documentary evidence, looking at surrounding circumstances and speaking to the employee and any other witnesses.
  • The employee should be provided with a copy of all evidence upon which the employer proposes to rely in good time prior to any disciplinary meeting.

Speak to Jon Dunkley

Jon is a Partner at Wollens and can advise you. Contact Jon via email jon.dunkley@wollens.co.uk or call 01271 341021.

Jon Dunkley - Wollens Solicitors Devon

You can also complete an online enquiry form. One of the Wollens team will contact you as soon as they are available.

Related News & Insights

4 minute read
Wollens Welcomes Five New Trainee Solicitors - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Wollens Welcomes Five New Trainee Solicitors

Read Article
4 minute read
No Right of Way? Five Solutions When a Property Has No Recorded Access Rights - Wollens Solicitors Devon

No Right of Way? Five Solutions When a Property Has No Recorded Access Rights

Read Article
7 minute read
From draft to detail: understanding the key terms in your share purchase agreement - Wollens Solicitors Devon

From draft to detail: understanding the key terms in your share purchase agreement

Read Article
8 minute read
Can my solicitor help me stay in my own home? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Can my solicitor help me stay in my own home?

Read Article
9 minute read
Buying neighbouring land - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Buying neighbouring land

Read Article
3 minute read
When A&E Gets It Wrong: The Rise in Emergency Department Claims - Wollens Solicitors Devon

When A&E Gets It Wrong: The Rise in Emergency Department Claims

Read Article
6 minute read
Corporate Restructuring: A Foundation to Success - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Corporate Restructuring: A Foundation to Success

Read Article
4 minute read
Understanding Erb’s Palsy - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Understanding Erb’s Palsy

Read Article