Harassment is where someone engages in unwanted conduct in relation to a protected characteristic (such as race or sex) which has the purpose or effect of either violating another person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment (section 26 Equality Act 2010). Section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 says that employers must not discriminate or victimise employees by dismissing them, including constructive dismissals. However, the terms in section 40 relating to harassment do not refer to constructive dismissal. In Timothy James Consulting v Wilton, the EAT held that a constructive dismissal could not amount to harassment precisely because of the differences between sections 39 and 40. The EAT has now revisited this issue in Driscoll v V & P Global.

The employee claimed that she had been harassed during her employment which eventually led her to resign. She claimed that her constructive dismissal was also an act of harassment. That harassment claim was struck out  by the employment tribunal because it was bound by Wilton. The employee appealed. 

The EAT looked at the European law which underpins the Equality Act 2010 and said it was clear that the intention was for harassment provisions to also cover dismissals. The term must be construed widely and there was no good reason to exclude constructive dismissals from that remit. The EAT said that the fact of whether there is a dismissal cannot depend on whether an employee is told to get out or is driven out instead. Wilton was wrong. Where an employee resigns in response to harassment which is repudiatory conduct, the constructive dismissal itself is capable of being ‘unwanted conduct’ too.

This case clears up a legislative anomaly which stemmed from the historical treatment of harassment as acts of discrimination or victimisation before the statutory definition of harassment was added to the statute books in 2005. It is now clear that constructive dismissal can be an act of harassment as well as other forms of discrimination. 

Speak to Jon Dunkley

Jon is a Partner at Wollens and can advise you. Contact Jon via email jon.dunkley@wollens.co.uk or call 01271 341021.

Jon Dunkley - Wollens Solicitors Devon

You can also complete an online enquiry form. One of the Wollens team will contact you as soon as they are available.

Related News & Insights

3 minute read
When 25% becomes 2.5%: a useful reminder on Acas Code uplifts - Wollens Solicitors Devon

When 25% becomes 2.5%: a useful reminder on Acas Code uplifts

Read Article
3 minute read
Belief discrimination: where are we now? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Belief discrimination: where are we now?

Read Article
3 minute read
Training cost clawbacks: when does repayment become an unlawful restraint? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Training cost clawbacks: when does repayment become an unlawful restraint?

Read Article
3 minute read
Third-party harassment is coming back: are you ready? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Third-party harassment is coming back: are you ready?

Read Article
3 minute read
Sexual harassment training: When does training become ‘stale’? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Sexual harassment training: When does training become ‘stale’?

Read Article
3 minute read
Equal pay, but not just for sex? Government consults on a major rethink of pay discrimination - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Equal pay, but not just for sex? Government consults on a major rethink of pay discrimination

Read Article
1 minute read
Sticking to the legal minimum is not necessarily good HR practice - Wollens Solicitors Devon

Sticking to the legal minimum is not necessarily good HR practice

Read Article
2 minute read
The right to be accompanied: don’t ask, don’t get? - Wollens Solicitors Devon

The right to be accompanied: don’t ask, don’t get?

Read Article